IN THE MATTER OF RODNEY DALE CLASS VS. U.S.


RoH-Post-Logo
Published on 10-30-2014 by THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST
The Committee on Human Rights is approached by the brother of Rod Class this afternoon on 10-30-2014: The Brother of Rod Class is extremely concerned about Rod Class based on his recent arrest over a two or three year argument about alleged weapons violations. The Committee heard some of the details of the case and decided that the Class brothers cannot be worked with at this time. Further, there are no human rights being violated against Rod Class. As a matter of fact, Rod Class is actually violating Article 20, section 1 and 2 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. However, the U.S. has not filed any Human Rights Violations against Rod Class with the Clerk of The Human Rights Tribunal at this time.  Lets Explain: Rod Class is arguing U.S. Constitution and Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) as a defense, yet has never signed the U.S. constitution nor is Rod Class licensed to use the UCC. The People of the United States have not invited Rod Class to be a part of that association. Rod Class is forcing the U.S. constitution association on people through administrative law that are not a party to that constitution, including Rod Class, yet feels justified in telling others what they are doing wrong in administrative procedures that are being implemented by Metro. Metro has nothing to do with the U.S. Constitution as a private membership association and Rod Class is not using any administrative procedure to create a peaceful settlement or solution. Rod Class is practicing Administrative Law as a weapon which is not a part of the UCC nor the U.S. constitution. On or about July 11th, 2014, Rod Class was speaking to a woman named Debra. Debra tried to explain to Rod Class many times in that recording what to do and how to do it, meaning getting out of the empire. Rod Class did not listen to a thing Debra was saying and basically wasted Debra’s precious time for about an hour and a half. The Committee tried to explain how to fix the issue, however, the explanation fell on deaf ears because of the constant will to fight rather than resolve the issue and move on. The failure of Metro to resolve this issue by and between Rod Class and the U.S. is a real problem. It is a failure of the Metro administrative system to remain neutral in resolving issues administratively as a third party settlement board. The Metro System is actually agitating the problem rather than resolving the problem by not explaining the true purpose of administrative procedure. However, there are no human rights violations at this time and all parties are at fault in one way or another. The Human Rights Tribunal will remain neutral unless approached by Rod Class AND the U.S. to resolve the matter.
Human Rights Definition: Administrative law: Many countries provide separate legal systems for handling non-criminal conflicts between citizens and the state, which are usually called systems of administrative law. Even where, as in the United Kingdom, there is no formally separate system, a functional division is likely to exist, with judges specializing in such conflicts, and with the development of special procedures and legal doctrines. At one time the dominant thinking in the UK was that administrative law should not be a separate system, because there would actually be less control over the executive if public bodies were not subjected to the same controls as all other citizens through the common law. This view, associated with A.V.Dicey (1835–1922), held that European societies were executive-dominated because the administrative law system allowed public servants to hide from the scrutiny of truly independent courts. It has largely been discredited, at least in part because the UK found it necessary to develop de-facto, if not de-jure, administrative law courts of its own. Administrative law is characterized by a very strong insistence that all acts of public officials be clearly intra-vires, fully authorized by a legitimate rule or statute. Administrative law seldom goes beyond that, because the courts in question are expressly not authorized to challenge the legitimacy of the authorizing legislation itself. Thus in countries such as Germany and Italy, and, in a different way, France, which have both administrative law and constitutional law, questions of the validity of the authorizing laws are strictly reserved to the constitutional courts. There are other doctrines,sometimes very powerful ones, used in European administrative law which, unlike the basic intra vires test, have no clear counterpart in common law jurisdictions. Two of the more important doctrines are those governing misuse of power, best known by its French label of détournement de pouvoir, and the concept of proportionality in administrative action. Misuse of power here means using an acknowledged legitimate power for ends that were not intended by the legislature, while proportionality means that no more far reaching administrative action is justified than is minimally necessary to achieve the legitimate aims of the legislation authorizing the actions. This latter doctrine is beginning to be accepted into common law jurisdictions, especially in Canada and, to a lesser extent, in the UK. As the European Court of Justice (ECJ) develops increasing power,and hears more and more appeals from citizens of member states under the Article 177 proceedings, something like a European administrative or public law system is developing, helped by the fact that the ECJ has incorporated the European Convention on Human Rights directly into European Union law.

7 Responses to IN THE MATTER OF RODNEY DALE CLASS VS. U.S.

  1. snoop4truth says:

    ROD CLASS & THE “DEBRA JONES HOAX”

    Rodney DALE Class (“Rod Class”) is an amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education who teaches amateur legal theories to other amateur legal theorists. BUT, CLASS LIES TO HIS FOLLOWERS ABOUT WINNING CASES IN COURT. CLASS HAS ACTUALLY LOST ALL OF THEM. THAT’S RIGHT. CLASS HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (WELL OVER 65 COMPLETE, CONSECUTIVE LOSSES AND STILL COUNTING). NOT ONLY DOES CLASS LIE TO HIS FOLLOWERS ABOUT WINNING CASES IN COURT, HE ALSO LIES TO HIS FOLLOWERS ABOUT HOW HE ACHIEVED THOSE IMAGINARY VICTORIES IN COURT. CLASS FRAUDULENTLY TELLS HIS FOLLOWERS THAT HE WON ALL OF HIS CASES BY USING HIS AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES AND HIS AMATEUR “PAPERWORK”. (LIES ON TOP OF LIES.).

    But more importantly, Class is also a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER. He is behind the “Judge DALE Hoax”, the “FOURTH Administrative Ruling Hoax”, the “Property In Other People’s Names Hoax”, the “Private Attorney General Hoax”, the “Right To Travel Hoax”, the “Embezzling Federal Funds Hoax” and the “CRIS Hoax”. (All of these hoaxes will soon be exposed). But, most importantly for this expose’, Class is also behind the “Debra Jones Hoax”.

    THE HOAX: Class has own internet radio show on AIB radio which he uses to sell his amateur belief system about the law and the legal system. On July 8, 2014, in Episode 869, Class purported to bring in a “legal insider” as a guest on his radio show in order to validate, bolster and to provide support for his own amateur legal theories about the law and the legal system. Class FRAUDULENTLY introduced this FAKE “legal insider” as “former attorney” and “former law enforcement officer”, “Debra Jones’’. As planned, during this 2 hour 43 minute show, this FAKE “legal insider” mindlessly “parroted” the same “amateur legal theories” (FAKE laws) and utterly delusional claims about the law and the legal system that Class himself makes. Rod Class’ radio audience was understandably shocked and horrified by the FAKE, FALSE and FRAUDULENT claims of Debra Jones who they genuinely believed was a real “legal insider” who was telling them the truth. This FAKE radio show became an internet sensation, much to the delight of Rod Class and Debra Jones. It was an absolute disgrace.

    THE TRUTH: But, before putting her on his internet radio show, Class already knew that:
    1. Debra Jones’ REAL name is “Debra Jenks Jones”;
    2. Debra Jenks Jones was born on May, 29, 1967;
    3. As of today, Debra Jenks Jones is currently 49 years old;
    4. Debra Jenks Jones’ social security number is (redacted) 531-80-XXXX;
    5. Debra Jenks Jones lives at (redacted) XXXX XXXth Street Court, Puyallup, Pierce County, Washington State, 98375 and has lived there since April of 1995.;
    6. Debra Jenks Jones HAS NEVER HAD a “professional license” of ANY TYPE from ANY STATE which means that she was NEVER an “ attorney”, a person who would have had a “professional license” from at least one state (at least at some point in time in the past).
    7. Debra Jenks Jones was NEVER a “law enforcement officer” in any jurisdiction.

    NOTE: It is a federal felony to use a “means of interstate commerce” (like the internet) to commit fraud (like soliciting and collecting money from victims for seminars by fraudulently claiming to be a “former attorney” and/or a “former police officer”). It is a state crime to impersonate an attorney and a state law enforcement officer.

    CONCLUSION: As this HOAX conclusively proves, Rod Class will not hesitate to lie to you and to defraud you if doing so helps him “sell” his “amateur belief system” about the law and the legal system to you. Needless to say, if you paid Debra Jones hundreds or thousands of dollars to attend one or more of her seminars in the belief that she is a “former real estate attorney” and a “former police woman”, then you were defrauded and ripped-off. You should demand your money back and/or contact law enforcement authorities. Rod Class and Debra Jones should be ashamed of themselves for committing this VICIOUS ATTACK on the America people. They should both immediately apologize to the American people for what they have done and they should both immediately discontinue their pattern of fraud upon the American people.

    ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH: Snoop4truth is an American Patriot and legal expert who vehemently opposes INTENTIONAL LEGAL DISINFORMATION. Snoop4truth did not expose the “Judge DALE Hoax”, the “Debra Jones Hoax” or the falsity of Rod Class’ claims about the law in order to harm Rod Class or Debra Jenks Jones. That would serve no useful purpose. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed the “Judge DALE Hoax”, the “Debra Jones Hoax” and the falsity of Rod Class’ claim SOLELY TO REDUCE THE CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE THAT SUCH PURPOSEFUL AND INTENTIONAL FRAUD INFLICTS ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE EVERY SINGLE DAY.

    • snoop4truth says:

      ROD CLASS AND THE “PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL HOAX”

      Rod Class falsely claims to be a “Private Attorney General” under Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and/or The Civil Rights Act Of 1866, BOTH of which are ordinary, FEDERAL, “CIVIL RIGHTS” STATUTES. Class also falsely claims that these two ordinary, FEDERAL, “CIVIL RIGHTS” STATUTES somehow “authorize” him personally to “represent” any party in connection with any kind of case (not just “civil rights” cases) in any court and to otherwise practice law without a license in any court in any jurisdiction (STATE or FEDERAL) in that imaginary capacity. Finally, Class falsely claims that as a “Private Attorney General” under these TWO FEDERAL “CIVIL RIGHTS” STATUTES, he is EXTREMELY important, EXTREMELY powerful and EXTREMELY knowledgeable in the law.

      But, contrary to Rod Class’ claims, THE TERM, “PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL” IS NOT A “PROFESSIONAL” OR “OCCUPATIONAL” TITLE (like “Attorney At Law” or like “Attorney General”), much less a “professional” or “occupational” TITLE for a non-lawyer who is knowledgeable in amateur/oppostional/defiant legal theories (FAKE laws) who is somehow authorized to represent a party in court and to otherwise practice law without a license in any court in any jurisdiction in that imaginary capacity.

      FACT: THE TERM “PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL” DOES NOT APPEAR IN A SINGLE FEDERAL STATUTE, much less in Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988 or in the Civil Rights Act of 1866. FACT: Congress has NEVER “authorized” or “credentialed” any person to represent a party in court or to otherwise practice law without a license. FACT: Under the tenth amendment of the United States Constitution, Congress HAS NO POWER (“NO JURISDICTION”) to “authorize” or to “credential” any person to represent a party in court or to otherwise practice law (only the STATES can do that).

      THE TRUTH: The term, “Private Attorney General” is actually a temporary, JUDICIAL nickname created and used by the FEDERAL COURTS (that expires by the end of the case) for an “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” (who has already WON an ordinary CIVIL case against a statutory violator) and who has NO knowledge of the law, who has NO legal authority, who has NO power and who has NO importance that any other “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” does not already have.

      There are ONLY THREE DIFFERENCES between a generic “Private Attorney General” and ANY OTHER “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF”. First, a “Private Attorney General” is a (natural or artificial) person who/which is expressly authorized by the SAME STATUTE VIOLATED (or a statute that refers to the SAME STATUTE VIOLATED) TO BECOME AN “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” and to FILE an ordinary CIVIL suit against the party who/that allegedly violated the statute. Second, a “Private Attorney General” is also statutorily entitled by the SAME STATUTE VIOLATED (or a statute that refers to that SAME STATUTE VIOLATED) to an award of legal fees from the other side IF, AND ONLY IF he/she/it hires a REAL ATTORNEY AT LAW who actually WINS the CIVIL suit that/he/she/it actually FILED against the alleged statutory violator. Third, a “Private Attorney General” must actually WIN the CIVIL suit that he/she/it actually FILED against the alleged statutory violator.

      If you will actually read the words that appear in Title 42 U.S.C. 1988 and/or the Civil Rights Act of 1866, (and the FEDERAL “CIVIL RIGHTS” STATUTES referred to in them), you will discover that THEY ONLY DO TWO THINGS in terms of the “CONCEPT” of a “Private Attorney General”. First, they permit a “VICTIM” (AND ONLY A “VICTIM”) of a statutory violation of the words that actually appear IN THOSE TWO FEDERAL “CIVIL RIGHTS” STATUTES (and to those FEDERAL “CIVIL RIGHTS” STATUTES referred to in them) AND ONLY THOSE STATUTES to become an “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” and to FILE an ordinary CIVIL suit against the alleged statutory violator IN FEDERAL COURT (AND ONLY IN FEDERAL COURT). Second, they permit the FEDERAL judge to award LEGAL FEES to the “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” IF, AND ONLY IF he/she/it actually hired a REAL ATTORNEY AT LAW who actually WINS that CIVIL case. THESE TWO FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS STATUTES DO NOTHING ELSE in terms of the “CONCEPT” of a “Private Attorney General”.

      Indeed, The formal name of Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988 is actually the “CIVIL RIGHTS ATTORNEY’S FEES AWARDS ACT”. This means that the SOLE PURPOSE of that statute is TO PROVIDE PAYMENT to REAL ATTORNEYS AT LAW who actually WIN such CIVIL cases on behalf of “CIVIL RIGHTS” VICTIMS who have suffered a VIOLATION of one or more of the FEDERAL “CIVIL RIGHTS” STATUTES specifically enumerated in that statute.

      Both Title 42 U.S.C. § § 1988 and the Civil Rights Act 0f 1866 are “FEE SHIFTING” statutes. This means that they “SHIFT” the WINNING party’s financial obligation to pay his/her/its OWN ATTORNEY’S LEGAL FEES to the LOSING party. As a result, “CIVIL RIGHTS” “VICTIMS” who have no money, but who have meritorious “CIVIL RIGHTS” cases, are still able to obtain the legal services of a REAL ATTORNEY AT LAW who will likely be paid by the other side at the end of the case.

      Contrary to Rod Class’ claims, there is NOTHING about these TWO FEDERAL “CIVIL RIGHTS” STATUTES that “authorizes” or “credentials” any non-lawyer to “represent” a party in court, to practice law without a license or to use the temporary, JUDICIAL nickname, “Private Attorney General”, as if it were a “professional” or “occupational” TITLE (like “Judge”, Prosecutor”, “Sheriff”, “Marshal” or “Deputy”, etc.).

      A person WHO REALLY IS a “Private Attorney General” under Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and/or under The Civil Rights Act Of 1866 IS A “VICTIM” (and only a “victim”) of a violation of those FEDERAL “CIVIL RIGHTS” that are protected and enforced by those two FEDERAL “CIVIL RIGHTS” STATUTES (AND ONLY THOSE STATUTES). A person WHO REALLY IS a “Private Attorney General” under Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and/or the Civil Rights Act of 1866 IS A “PLAINTIFF” (NOT A “DEFENDANT”). A person WHO REALLY IS a “Private Attorney General” under Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and/or the Civil Rights Act of 1866 IS IN “FEDERAL” COURT (NOT IN “STATE” COURT) (State courts have no jurisdiction to hear or decide cases involving alleged violations of FEDERAL “CIVIL RIGHTS” STATUTES.). A person WHO REALLY IS a “Private Attorney General” under Title 42 U.S.C.§ 1988 and/or the Civil Rights Act of 1866 IS A “PARTY” to the litigation (NOT A PERSON WHO PURPORTS TO “REPRESENT” A PARTY to the litigation). Finally, a person WHO REALLY IS a “Private Attorney General” under Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and/or the Civil Rights Act of 1866 is an “ordinary civil plaintiff” who has already WON the CIVIL suit that he/she FILED against the alleged statutory violator. But, Rod Class does not know any of this.

      IQ TEST: So, if you are a “DEFENDANT” in federal court and you are charged with the “CRIME” of “carrying” “weapons” onto United States Capitol grounds, it is LEGALLY IMPOSSIBLE for you to be a “Private Attorney General” under Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and/or under The Civil Rights Act of 1866, or any other statute (because you are a “DEFENDANT” in a “CRIMINAL” case and to be a “Private Attorney General” under those TWO FEDERAL “CIVIL RIGHTS” STATUTES, or any other statute, you must be a “PLAINTIFF” who actually FILED and who already WON a FEDERAL“CIVIL RIGHTS” “CIVIL” suit against the alleged statutory violator). So, if you are a defendant in a “STATE” Traffic Ticket case OR a plaintiff in a “STATE” Administrative Court case, then it is LEGALLY IMPOSSIBLE for you to be a “Private Attorney General” under Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and/or under The Civil Rights Act of 1866 (because you are in “STATE” court case and to be a “Private Attorney General” under those TWO FEDERAL “CIVIL RIGHTS” STATUTES, you must actually be IN FEDERAL COURT). So, IF YOU PURPORT TO “REPRESENT” ANY “PARTY” to the litigation IN ANY COURT ANYWHERE, then it is LEGALLY IMPOSSIBLE for you to be a “Private Attorney General” under Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and/or under The Civil Rights Act of 1866, or any other statute (because you are PURPORTING TO “REPRESENT” A “PARTY” to the litigation and to be a “Private Attorney General” under these TWO FEDERAL “CIVIL RIGHTS” STATUTES, or any other statute, YOU MUST ACTUALLY BE A “PARTY” to the litigation, NOT someone WHO PURPORTS TO “REPRESENT” A “PARTY” to the litigation). So, if you have LOST EVERY SINGLE ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL CASE IN WHICH YOU HAVE EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 70 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW), it is LEGALLY IMPOSSIBLE for you to be a “Private Attorney General” under Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and/or the Civil Rights Act of 1866, or any other statute (because you LOST every single case in which you have ever been involved and in order to be a “Private Attorney General” under these TWO FEDERAL “CIVIL RIGHTS” STATUTES, or any other statute, you must have already WON the CIVIL suit that you actually FILED against the alleged statutory violator). But, Rod Class does not know any of this.

      Because an “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” cannot represent a party in court or otherwise practice law without a license, and because a “Private Attorney General” IS AN “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF”, a “Private Attorney General” cannot represent a party in court or otherwise practice law without a license either. This is because the term, “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF,” and the term, “Private Attorney General”, are two different terms THAT MEAN THE VERY SAME THING. But, Rod Class does not know this.

      I.Q. TEST: An attorney at law IS an attorney IN EVERY sense of the word. But, a “Private Attorney General” IS NOT an attorney IN ANY sense of the word! An attorney at law represents a party in court. But, a “Private Attorney General” IS A PARTY IN COURT! An attorney at law represents a client in court. But, a “Private Attorney General” IS A CLIENT IN COURT! An attorney at law acts on behalf of people WHO ARE IN COURT. But, a “Private Attorney General” acts on his/her/its own behalf and on behalf of people WHO ARE OUT OF COURT! A person’s status as an attorney at law CONTINUES AFTER THE END OF THE CASE. But, a person’s status of a “Private Attorney General” is temporary and ENDS, AT THE LATEST, AT THE END OF THE CASE! A person CANNOT BE a “Private Attorney General” AFTER THE END OF THE CASE any more than a person can be an “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” AFTER THE END OF THE CASE. But, Rod Class does not know this.

      SOURCE: So, where did this insignificant, temporary, JUDICIAL nickname come from? Well, a REAL governmental “Attorney General” WINS lawsuits against statutory violators which helps to enforce the law thereby benefitting society as a whole. Likewise, an “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” who WINS lawsuits against statutory violators also helps to enforce the law thereby benefitting society as a whole. Noting the similarity IN FUNCTION AND END RESULT between a REAL governmental “Attorney General” who WINS such lawsuits and an “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” who WINS such lawsuits, the FEDERAL courts, during that final portion of the case when legal fees might be awarded, began jokingly referring to such “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFFS” who WIN such lawsuits as “Private Attorneys General”. The FEDERAL courts still use this temporary, JUDICIAL nickname, during that final portion of the case when legal fees might be awarded, to remind the litigants that such an “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” who has already WON such a CIVIL suit against a statutory violator has rendered a public service by helping to enforce the law and is, therefore, statutorily eligible for an award of legal fees IF, AND ONLY IF that “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” was represented by a REAL ATTORNEY AT LAW in WINNING the case. But, Rod Class does not know this.

      DURATION: The term, “Private Attorney General” ONLY APPLIES to such an “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” from the time of any WIN of such a CIVIL case until the time WHEN ANY LEGAL FEES MIGHT BE AWARDED, or until the end of the case, whichever comes sooner. At that point, the temporary, JUDICIAL nickname, “Private Attorney General” has served its purpose AND EXPIRES FOREVER. So, there is NO SUCH THING as a “Private Attorney General” AFTER THE END OF THE CASE. But, Rod Class does not know this.

      Thus, in creating and using this temporary, JUDICIAL nickname for an “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” (“Private Attorney General”), the FEDERAL COURTS were NOT thereby elevating non-lawyers who were knowledgeable in amateur/oppositional/defiant legal theories (FAKE laws) to the professional level of REAL “ATTORNEYS AT LAW” or REAL “ATTORNEYS GENERAL”. In so doing, the FEDERAL COURTS were NOT thereby creating a “special class” of FAKE, phony, pretend, make-believe, unlicensed, uneducated, unqualified, self-proclaimed, self-appointed “attorneys” who were somehow “authorized” to represent a party in court or to otherwise practice law without a license in any court in any jurisdiction. In so doing, the FEDERAL COURTS were NOT thereby creating a “professional” or “occupational” TITLE (like “Attorney at Law” or “Attorney General” ) for non-lawyers to use in defrauding the public, to use in court, to use on their court documents, to use as the name of their internet radio show, to use on plaques hanging on their “back drop” on their video sets, to use on their “costumes”, to use on their vehicles, to use in their seminars or to otherwise use when otherwise impersonating a REAL “ATTORNEY AT LAW”, a REAL “ATTORNEY GENERAL” or a REAL “OFFICER” AUTHORIZED AND EMPOWERED TO CARRY OUT OR ENFORCE THE LAW.

      But, seeing an opportunity to defraud the American people (again), Rod Class and other amateur/oppositional/defiant legal theorists FRAUDULENTLY CLAIMED that this temporary, JUDICIAL nickname for an “ORDINARY CIVIL PLAINTIFF” (“Private Attorney General”) was a “professional” or “occupational” TITLE (like “Attorney At Law” and “Attorney General”) for a non-lawyer who is knowledgeable in amateur/oppostional/defiant legal theories (FAKE laws) who is somehow “authorized” to represent a party in court and to otherwise practice law without a license in any court in any jurisdiction. IT IS THIS FAKE DEFINITION OF A “PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL” THAT FORMS THE BASIS FOR THE ENTIRE “PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL HOAX”. Not surprisingly, the courts NEVER adopted this FAKE, DELUSIONAL, NON-SENSE definition for “Private Attorney General”.

      Rod Class and other amateur/oppostional/defiant legal theorists lavished this inapplicable, insignificant, but impressive-sounding , temporary JUDICIAL nickname (“Private Attorney General”) UPON THEMSELVES as if it were a “professional” or “occupational” TITLE (like “Attorney At Law” and like “Attorney General”) and use it in order to create the “ILLUSION” that they are EXTREMELY powerful, EXTREMELY important and EXTREMELY knowledgeable in the law (NONE of which is actually the case).

      CONCLUSION: Rod Class is not now and has never been a “Private Attorney General”. He doesn’t even know the meaning of the term. (He doesn’t know what it is, but based on all of the court rulings in all of his own court cases, he knows WHAT IT IS NOT.). If you have paid Rod Class for “training” on how to become a “Private Attorney General”, then you are a VICTIM of fraud. (It is a federal felony to use a means of interstate commerce, like the internet, to obtain money by marketing seminars under fraudulent pretenses). You may have a right to a refund. Contact Rod Class for a refund or contact federal law enforcement authorities in your area. If Rod Class has demanded and if you have paid Rod Class a “retainer”, “legal fees” and/or his “expenses” for travel, food and lodging in connection with his providing you with “legal services” in his imaginary capacity as a “Private Attorney General”, then you are a VICTIM of fraud. You may have the right to a refund. Contact Rod Class for a refund or contact the state bar or state law enforcement authorities where the offense occurred.

      FACT: AS OF TODAY, ROD CLASS (OR CLASS’ SIDE) HAS LOST OVER 70 CONSECUTIVE ADMINISTRATIVE OR JUDICIAL CASES IN A ROW (Class just LOST Carl & Vera Pertuset’s latest foreclosure case, LOST the retaliatory complaint that he filed aginst the attorneys involved with his LOSS in the Pertuset case. LOST Harold Stanley’s criminal tax evasion case, LOST Harold Stanley’s retaliatory civil suit against the prosecutor and others involved in his criminal tax evasion case, LOST Daryl Zenon Bodan’s traffic case, LOST a retaliatory Administrative Court case that he filed on behalf of Daryl Zenon Bodan in connection with his traffic case). More importantly, Class just LOST HIS OWN APPEAL in his “D.C. Carrying Weapons case” (which may render him INELIGIBLE for a conceal & carry permit and for gun possession in North Carolina). Rod Class has NEVER obtained a single administrative or judicial ruling that governments, government agencies or governmental employees were “private entities” (a plural term), private contractors”, “Corporate Appellees” or for-profit “corporations”, much less “FOUR” of them. That is another Rod Class hoax.

      FACT: THIS MEANS THAT EVERY, SINGLE, FICTIONAL, BRAGGADOCIOUS, SELF-GLORIFYING “WAR STORY” THAT ROD CLASS HAS EVER TOLD YOU ABOUT HIS INGENIOUS LEGAL TACTICS AND COUNTLESS LEGAL VICTORIES IN COURT WAS A “WAR STORY” THAT AROSE OUT OF A CASE THAT HE ACTUALLY LOST!

      FACT: THIS MEANS THAT EVERY, SINGLE, FICTIONAL, BRAGGADOCIOUS, SELF-GLORIFYING “WAR STORY” THAT ROD CLASS HAS EVER TOLD YOU ABOUT HIS INGENIOUS LEGAL TACTICS AND COUNTLESS LEGAL VICTORIES AROSE OUT OF A CASE THAT HE HAD NO LEGAL AUTHORITY TO EVEN SPEAK IN AT ALL, EXCEPT AS NECESSARY AS A “PARTY” OR AS NECESSARY AS A “FACT WITNESS” IF CALLED TO THE WITNESS STAND.

      What do you think about the truthfulness of Rod Class’ “war stories” now?

      ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
      Snoop4truth is a legal expert who opposes the mainstream media and legal disinformation for precisely the same reason, the people behind both disseminate INTENTIONALLY FALSE INFORMATION in order to advance their own agenda at the expense of the American people whom they pretend to serve.

      Had it not been for Rodney DALE Class’(“Rod Class’”) role in manufacturing and perpetuating the “Judge DALE Hoax” and the “Debra Jones Hoax”, Snoop4truth would not have exposed the “Private Attorney General Hoax” here.

      Snoop4truth did not expose the “Private Attorney General Hoax” to harm Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed the “Private Attorney General Hoax” SOLELY TO REDUCE THE CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such INTENTIONAL FRAUD inflicts upon the American people every single day. Deliberately lying to the American people about their law and their legal system is a willful act of treason and should be treated accordingly.

      NOTE: If Rod Class had simply told you the truth, then he would not be exposed now. The lesson? Just tell the truth and you will never be exposed.

      Its all about the truth. Just tell the truth.

      • michael turner white says:

        Snoop4truth: Can you direct me to the path leading to the consciousness opined by you? If, I am to be an American National all darkness must be removed from my heart, soul and mind. drkmichael@gmail.com

        • admin says:

          The Human Rights Tribunal said it all in the notice. There were no opinions in the article just the facts. The 1866 act would have been done after the 1864 definition of the state to include the District of Columbia which was against the Law of Nations. Might want to check the validity of the Act before attempting to stand on it. Just an observation.

  2. Heir says:

    Tell the Truth is it ? How about some observation over a number of years ?

    Most recently , notice the Original Posting of this story is unflattering and wall of text comments are separated by a year and a half interval .

    Hummm . . . says I . That’s a little odd . Wonder what’s up with that .

    I know Rod expected to not prevail in some early Suits in order to Appeal . A strategy .

    Rod coined a unique technique for keeping His efforts available for Public view by web publishing in the Public Domain on a Foreign server . He put up everything Court involved paperwork wise . He would Answer everything from His side via Service by Mail and put it up before Service could be effected . Ultimately the Opposition figured this and could know what was coming before hand .

    Publishing in this fashion prevented the information and Court exchange from becoming unavailable except at the local Court where the exchanges took place . The records could not be suppressed Sealed or otherwise marked Not For Publication . Not For Publication is a routine procedure available for Administrative Courts as administering is all in house . Cases that will be Published is where Parties have gotten a case into Law or Equity . My understanding is In Law cases are all published , Equity may be Sealed and Administrative has the option of non publication .

    Rod knew He was Subject to non publication and took an extraordinary measure in self publishing , outside Jurisdiction . He had no Ownership Interest in the Italian Server hosting a space for Him .

    Rod attempted to publish some things under the Pen Name Judge DALE . This effort was compromised by 2 people that spoofed stuff out with erroneous information under that Pen Name . Poisoned the pot and the “ Judge Dale Hoax “ spin was spun .

    I noted recently where the two involved admitted doing as much . Guess I better dig that back up . Tardiness in very long winded comments has suspicions up . Why this after Public awareness was sliding so effectively ? Spidey Sense says somethings noteworthy is in the works .

    I have yet to find a web source showing Evidence Rod has “ Lost “ all His Cases .

    I’m aware of Parents engaging State Child Protection Services with success and retaining custody or having a child returned to the Family after being taken . This with Rod and AIB team assistance .

    The Private Attorney General Statutes , State and Federal , are aimed at Labor Disputes primarily . California Revised Statutes are very clear in that respect . Federal implementation in Civil Rights matters sit squarely on Government Actors and Agencies as well , being Federal Employees and all .

    Rod had every Right to take the Title of PAV and Prosecute His cases . He didn’t need the Congressional Committee involved at all . Just a little exercise . Attorneys are now calling for abolishment of the Classification “ Private Attorney General “ .

    I note where the Commenter above claims to have some confidential information regarding Miss . Debra , although such could be easily fabricated from Public Records .

    The Area and Group Number can be ascertained easily enough and with Serial Number redacted , looks official and who would know otherwise . If the Area and Group are actually Hers I wonder which Agencies have access to that confidential information .

    I really wish Rod had dropped the Idiot U.C.C. stuff early on and simply stuck to the Language . My Signature line at the Motor Vehicle and S&L Bank is subscribed “ Of Necessity , Without Prejudice or Acceptance “ .

    I also wish He had taken the Trust Law foundation of the Constitution a little more seriously . Wouldn’t be so deeply in His current fix . I know His aim is to keep this Official Public Record and was thinking perhaps holding the Trust aspect to introduce as New Information . Maybe He is .

    The Fraud by Interstate Commerce comment is mis placed . Actually there are so many sideways statements made above it would take days of typing to comment on every one .

    His latest TalkShoe Webcast was put up 11/18/16 . He has plugging right along there . Feds a little reluctant to make those charges ?

    I’m listening to a fairly recent 3 part series where He brings up Trusts in relation to Government Function . I hope He’s not still missing the most salient points . Maybe just holding them in reserve .

  3. Sue Rhoades says:

    There is no way better to educate the system that what they’re doing is criminal than getting them to admit their “public” offices are vacant. Rod did this in four rulings in his home state of North Carolina. I worked in this system for 15 years and I can tell you the level of ego and massive fraud by the BAR Association and its various offshoots is astounding. Lawyers high-fiving themselves and celebrating the removal of an 80 year old woman from her home — so they could take it and make a profit. A trucking business owned by a family, their life’s work — stolen from them in a bid by BAR Association members disguised as layperson bidders during a fraudulent liquidation/action over a debt that we all know never existed. There is no better way in my opinion to let the system know that WE know and have had it than forcing them to admit they don’t follow their own rules, job descriptions and statutes and codes in a peaceful manner, then filing damage claims against them where either jailtime or monetary damages out of their pockets — or both — is the remedy by law. Yes, there are setbacks along the way, the path isn’t an easy one to walk — but at least there are people out there willing to do it for the public good. All the while, there will always be people who don’t believe this is the right path spending their free time trying to bash what we do instead of walking their own path. So be it. It won’t stop the truth from coming out and we believe a peaceful, transparent and non-confrontational education of the system has been a positive thing. I know first-hand the level of mis-education of lawyers and administrative personnel within the system that’s helping keep this fraud going, and I won’t stop walking the path no matter what and I suggest those who haven’t done the work and haven’t walked in my shoes find something else to do with their free time, like creating a better environment in their own back yards if they don’t want to participate in what we do. The record always speaks for itself.

  4. michael turner white says:

    I am a disciple of Rodney Dale Class with standing pursuant to the Private Attorney General Act 1866. My email is drkmichael@gmail.com. My legal library consist of Rodney Dale Class litigations that can be used by all indigenous people of this sphere called Earth.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: